D3 Morpheus — The Accountable Autonomous SOC

Built for the regulated SOC that can’t hire its way out of the alert volume — and can’t accept AI it can’t defend. Morpheus automates L1 triage on every alert, automatically, and keeps going to L2 deep investigation. Up to 95% of alerts triaged and L2-investigated in under two minutes. Every decision traceable in one regulator-readable audit trail across all four autonomy levels. Built for SEC Item 1.05, NYDFS Part 500, HIPAA 45 CFR 164.312, NERC CIP-008-6, OCC 36-hour notification, NIS2, DORA, and BSI C5 evidence demands.

Morpheus does the L1 work — classification, enrichment, prioritization — and keeps going to L2 deep investigation. Attack Path Discovery, D3’s investigation engine, traces the attack across identities, endpoints, cloud, and email infrastructure. It reaches back 90 days of telemetry. It maps blast radius. It drafts the remediation. Morpheus does the legwork. Your analyst does the analysis.

Choose the level. Same engine, same audit format, no architectural fork: Level 1 — Deterministic. No AI in the chain. Level 2 — AI-Assisted. You approve every action. Level 3 — AI-Led. The Adaptive Tasking copilot drafts; you oversee each command-risk tier. Level 4 — Autonomous. End-to-end triage and remediation. Pick the mode that fits your environment, regulator, or MSSP customer. Morpheus arrives pre-trained, then self-learns from your team’s best practices, threat and vulnerability reports, your SOPs. Predictable annual subscription across all four autonomy levels.

A full package — AI SOC, SOAR, and case management — with one control panel for triage, investigation, vulnerability triage, trend reporting, and compliance. One audit trail per incident — every action, every decision, every task, system or human, fully auditable, nothing hidden. Not a black box. Not a fleet of agents to reconcile. The trail maps to SEC, NYDFS, HIPAA, NERC CIP, NIS2, DORA, BSI C5, and the EU AI Act. 800+ self-healing integrations that fix themselves when vendors push API changes. Trusted by Fortune 500 enterprises and the world’s largest MSSPs.

Article 5 — Governance and Organizational Arrangements

Article 5 places ultimate responsibility for ICT risk on the management body of the financial entity. The management body must define, approve, oversee, and be accountable for the implementation of the ICT risk-management framework. It allocates budget, sets the entity’s risk tolerance, approves the digital operational resilience strategy, reviews ICT-related policies, and ensures clear roles and responsibilities for ICT functions. Members of the management body are required to actively keep current knowledge and skills sufficient to understand and assess ICT risk and its impact on operations.

Morpheus produces evidence at that altitude. Every escalation, every approval, every remediation is recorded in plain language, suitable for a management body or ICT risk committee. The four-level autonomy model lets the management body bound where AI may act independently and where a human must approve. The audit trail records which mode was active at every step.

Article 6 — ICT Risk Management Framework

Article 6 requires a comprehensive, well-documented ICT risk-management framework integrated into the entity’s overall risk-management system. The framework must cover identification, protection and prevention, detection, response and recovery, learning and evolving, and communication. It must be reviewed at least annually, on the occurrence of major ICT-related incidents, and after supervisory instructions or conclusions from digital operational resilience testing.

Morpheus addresses detection, response, recovery, and the evidentiary side of the framework directly. Attack Path Discovery is the detection and investigation engine. The Cybersecurity Triage Reasoning Graph constrains every reasoning step. The deterministic SOAR runbook underneath produces the documentation a supervisor expects when the framework is reviewed: who saw the incident, when, at what autonomy level, with what evidence, and with what outcome.

Article 19 — Reporting of Major ICT-Related Incidents

Article 19 sets a three-stage clock for major ICT-related incidents. A 4-hour initial notification to the competent authority once the incident is classified as major (and no later than 24 hours after detection). A 72-hour intermediate report with progress on classification, impact, and remediation. A 1-month final report covering root-cause analysis, applied mitigations, and lessons learned. Financial entities may also voluntarily notify significant cyber threats. Where the incident materially affects clients, Article 19 requires the entity to communicate with those clients on actions taken.

The fields a competent authority expects at each stage come from the same continuous audit trail Morpheus produces during the investigation. The 4-hour initial notification, the 72-hour intermediate report, and the 1-month final report read from one source — not three reconstructions across separate tools.

The audit trail Morpheus produces for DORA compliance is the same trail your financial entity can rely on outside the regulatory context.

Legal review. Litigation discovery, internal investigations, and external counsel review all need a defensible record of who did what, when, and why. The Morpheus trail surfaces every system action, every AI decision, every analyst approval — chronologically ordered, immutable, exportable.

Executive and board oversight. Audit committees, risk committees, and the C-suite increasingly want documented evidence of how cybersecurity decisions get made. The Morpheus trail produces the artifact: every escalation, every approval, every remediation — readable by a non-SOC stakeholder.

MSSP customer reporting. If your financial entity works with an MSSP partner running Morpheus across your tenant, the trail is the artifact your MSSP shares with you as proof-of-investigation. The same trail your competent authority reads is the trail you receive from your service provider.

The architecture is the same in every case. The audience changes; the artifact does not.

Further reading: Mythos & EU Regulatory Comparison whitepaper.